MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174241319 · doi:10.4095/328068

Les séries dendroisotopiques et leur signification climatique

2021· report· en· W3174241319 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Bégin, Martine M. Savard, José Carlos Marion, M Gingras

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three carbon and oxygen dendroisotopic series representative of the upstream sector of the La Grande River watershed and covering the period between 1800 and 2005 were produced under the ARCHIVES project. In order to use tree-ring isotopic ratios to reconstruct climatic conditions of the last centuries, we first assessed their climatic significance by conducting a statistical study of their relationship with hydrometeorological series available for the region. The results show that the two types of isotopic ratios in wood cellulose (delta-13C and delta-18O) are generally sensitive to the same climatic parameters, but at varying degrees, and that this sensitivity increases when the two isotopic indicators are combined (mean delta-13C and delta-18O values). They respond to the maximum temperature and total precipitation of the summer season (June to August), and also to some parameters integrating several aspects of the regional climate such as a climate index combining temperatures and precipitations, the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and regional River discharge. VPD is the parameter that most strongly correlates with the isotopic values, due to its direct influence on isotope fractionation processes related to stomatal functioning. The results presented in this chapter, clearly show that isotopic ratios of black spruce trees can be considered as excellent climate indicators for the boreal sector of northeastern America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAeolian processes and effectsFrench-language works237,207