MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identification and Characterization of UBE2O as a New β‐arrestin Interactor

2019· article· en· W3174330709 on OpenAlexaff
Badr Sokrat, Michel Bouvier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArrestinCell biologyUbiquitin ligaseInteractomeUbiquitinBiotinylationBiologyProximity ligation assayProtein–protein interactionScaffold proteinG protein-coupled receptorSignal transductionImmunoprecipitationMolecular biologyBiochemistryReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

β‐arrestin plays a major role in GPCR regulation and can act as a scaffolding protein for activation of non‐canonical signaling pathways. Thus, it is important to improve our knowledge of β‐arrestin interactors and the role of these protein complexes in GPCR regulation and signaling. The goal of this project was to identify new β‐arrestin interaction partners using the BioID proteomic approach. The BioID technique consists in the fusion of the biotin ligase protein BirA to β‐arrestin and exploits BirA capacity to biotinylate proteins in its proximity. The biotinylated proteins can then be isolated using streptavidin beads and identified by mass spectrometry. We identified 37 potential interactors for β‐arrestin 1 and 86 potential interactors for β‐arrestin 2 localized in different cellular compartments and involved in many different cellular functions and signaling pathways. One of the potential interactors identified is the atypical ubiquitin ligase UBE2O, which caught our attention due to the importance of ubiquitination in β‐arrestin and GPCR regulation. We confirmed the interaction between β‐arrestin 2 and UBE2O by co‐immunoprecipitation. UBE2O is known for its role in the monoubiquitination of BAP1, a tumor suppressor protein that interacts with chromatin‐associated proteins and regulates cell proliferation, resulting in its cytoplasmic sequestration. However, UBE2O function in β‐arrestin and GPCR signaling remains unknown. Considering that β‐arrestin shuttles between the cytoplasm and nucleus, UBE2O could play a role in the regulation of its cellular localization. Using different proteomic and biochemical approaches, we explored the function of UBE2O in GPCR and β‐arrestin ubiquitination and its potential effects on GPCR signaling and trafficking. We were able to identify by mass spectrometry UBE2O substrates involved in GPCR signaling and we showed that UBE2O affects β‐arrestin and GPCR trafficking by ebBRET (Enhanced bystander bioluminescence resonance energy transfer). Considering GPCRs physiological and therapeutic importance, this project will allow improvement of our understanding and knowledge on ubiquitination regulation of GPCR signaling and could contribute to revealing new signaling modalities that might have therapeutic relevance. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→