Effect of Wii-Based Motor and Cognitive Training on Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Parkinson’s disease is considered predominantly a disorder of the basal ganglia. Their vastsystem of communication allows them to get involved with a variety of functions, including automatic andvoluntary motor control, procedural learning relating to routine behaviors, and emotional functions. Theassociation with other cortical areas ensures smoothly orchestrated movement control and motor behaviors.Method: Experimental Study i.e. Pre to post-test experimental study design with two groups. Conventionalsampling of 60 subjects diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease were randomly distributed in two groups i.e.group E and group C. Group C were given global exercise whereas group E were given exercise using WIIconsole. The outcome was assessed in terms of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Unified Parkinson’s DiseaseRating Scale (UPDRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Unipedal Stance Test (UST).The subject performed 14 individual 1-hour training sessions, twice a week for 7 weeks.Conclusion: Based on the statistical analysis, it is concluded that WII based motor and cognitive traininghave a good impact on Activity of daily living of patients with Parkinson’s disease. WII based trainingshowed slightly better improvement in the Experimental group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".