MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The gene TDAG51 facilitates the phosphorylation of eIF2α in mouse embryonic fibroblasts

2011· article· en· W3174407408 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel E. Carlisle, Jeffrey G. Dickhout, Richard C. Austin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsUnfolded protein responsePhosphorylationDephosphorylationTunicamycinEndoplasmic reticulumCell biologyGene knockdownIntegrated stress responseCHOPChemistryBiologyMolecular biologyTranslation (biology)PhosphataseMessenger RNABiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unfolded protein accumulation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) results in ER stress. This causes the binding of GRP78 to unfolded proteins, auto‐phosphorylation of PERK and the phosphorylation of eIF2α, leading to changes in the rate and characteristics of protein synthesis, including an upregulation of CHOP/GADD153 expression. TDAG51 is an ER stress response gene and has been shown to regulate translation. We hypothesized that TDAG51 influences protein translation by mediating the phosphorylation of eIF2α. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) treated with ER stressors, tunicamycin (Tm; 5 μg/ml) or thapsigargin (Tg; 1 μM), or a phosphorylated eIF2α dephosphorylation inhibitor, salubrinal (30 μM), or combined treatments demonstrated an increase in eIF2α phosphorylation. TDAG51 −/− MEFs showed a decrease in eIF2α phosphorylation to drug vehicle, Tm plus salubrinal, Tg and Tg plus salubrinal treatment. It was determined that TDAG51 −/− MEFs have reduced CHOP/GADD153 expression compared to wild type cells. Therefore, TDAG51 knockout may regulate CHOP/GADD153 expression by reducing the phosphorylation of eIF2α, which in turn may lead to decreased expression of GADD34, essentially inhibiting the GADD34/PP1 dephosphorylation complex. This mechanism is also being investigated through the use of siRNA‐mediated knockdown. Supported by CIHR MOP‐67116.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease→French-language works237,207→