MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174409700 · doi:10.1029/2020jg006134

Climate Change is Contributing to Faster Rates of Lake Ice Loss in Lakes Around the Northern Hemisphere

2021· article· en· W3174409700 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Arshad Imrit, Sapna Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhenologyNorthern HemisphereClimate changeClimatologyPhysical geographyEnvironmental scienceTeleconnectionCryosphereSouthern HemisphereGeographyOceanographySea iceEcologyGeologyEl Niño Southern Oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lake ice phenology has been recorded for decades, providing us with long‐term records to investigate the impact of climate change in lakes since the Industrial Revolution. Here, we examine the trends and drivers of 18 lakes across the Northern Hemisphere, with 156–204 years of data, starting in the 1810s. We show that: (a) trends in ice phenology are faster than found by previous studies. Ice‐on is 11 days later per century, ice‐off is 9 days earlier per century, and ice cover duration is 19 days shorter per century; (b) there are significant breakpoints in the 1850s, 1870s, mid‐1890s, and mid‐1990s, after which trends in ice phenology are even faster, and associated with changing weather and climate; and (c) local air temperatures explain the most variation in ice phenology, on average 36.5%, followed by progressive climate change explaining around 17.5% on average, with teleconnection patterns explaining the least variation. Our findings support the assertion that broad‐scale climatic changes have led to more rapid lake ice loss in lakes distributed across the Northern Hemisphere, with potential widespread impacts on critical ecosystem services that lake ice provides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207