MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Vivo Targeting of the Endothelium to Improve Vascular Function in a Rodent Model of Type 2 Diabetes

2019· article· en· W3174475147 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rayan Khaddaj‐Mallat, Cini Mathew John, Ramesh C. Mishra, Dylan John Kendrick, Heike Wulff, Andrew P. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicApelin-related biomedical research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineVasodilationElectrical impedance myographyMesenteric arteriesBradykininType 2 diabetesEndothelial dysfunctionInternal medicineEndocrinologyEndotheliumDiabetes mellitusIn vivoAcetylcholineArteryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endothelial dysfunction has been identified as an early event in the progression of cardiovascular complications (e.g. hypertension, cardiomyopathy, stroke) commonly observed in patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Importantly, reduction/reversal of endothelial dysfunction is expected to mitigate the cardiovascular deficits associated with T2D. Small‐ and intermediate‐conductance, Ca 2+ ‐activated K + channels (KCa2.3 and KCa3.1, respectively) are prominently expressed in the vascular endothelium, and pharmacologic activators of these channels (e.g. SKA‐31) induce robust vasodilation upon acute exposure in isolated arteries and intact animals. However, the effects of prolonged in vivo administration of KCa activators such as SKA‐31 have not been examined to date. In our current study, we have hypothesized that daily administration of SKA‐31 (10 and 30 mg/kg, I.P. injection) to male, Type 2 Diabetic Goto‐Kakizaki rats (T2D GK, 14 weeks of age) for 12 weeks would ameliorate diabetes‐related cardiovascular deficits. In isolated mesenteric resistance arteries examined by pressure myography, we observed that SKA‐31 treatment significantly improved endothelium‐dependent vasodilation in response to 0.3 μM acetylcholine (ACh) (percent of maximal dilation = 37.7 ± 7.3% and 33.6 ± 6.2% for 10 and 30 mg/kg treatments) compared with vehicle‐treated animals (20.7 ± 3.1%) (means ± S.D., n = 6 animals/group). Similar effects were observed for 0.3 μM bradykinin (BK) (evoked vasodilation = 54.1 ±7.8% and 47.9 ± 6.6% for 10 and 30 mg/kg SKA‐31, respectively) compared with vehicle (33.6 ±6.1%). SKA‐31 administration also reduced alpha1‐adrenergic (phenylephrine, 1 μM) stimulated constriction in 10 and 30 mg/kg treated T2D GK rats (percent of maximal contraction = 37.1 ± 5.0% and 36.1 ± 3.7%, respectively) compared with vehicle treated animals (46.6 ± 4.5%, n = 6 per group). Western blot analyses further revealed that SKA‐31 administration increased the expression of mesenteric KCa2.3 and KCa3.1 channels and associated cell‐signaling components (i.e. type 1 IP3 receptor and the SERCA2 Ca 2+ ‐ATPase) that contribute to endothelium‐dependent, agonist‐evoked vasodilation. In contrast, SKA‐31 treatment did not augment ACh and BK evoked vasodilation in myogenically active, cremaster skeletal muscle resistance arteries from the same animals, compared with the vehicle treated group. Collectively, these data demonstrate that in vivo administration of an endothelial KCa channel activator can selectively improve vascular function in the setting of T2D. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by research funding to APB from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP‐142467) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN‐2017‐04116), and to HW from the National Institutes of Health (R21 NS101876). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicApelin-related biomedical researchFrench-language works237,207