O espaço-tempo da experiência vivida e a crítica da vida cotidiana: algumas reflexões
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente ensaio tem como objetivo principal discutir as aproximações teóricas e práticas da análise do espaço-tempo da experiência vivida com a crítica da vida cotidiana. Através de ampla revisão bibliográfica, buscamos apresentar a proposta da crítica da vida cotidiana de Lefebvre em aproximação com a perspectiva das derivas experimentais dos Situacionistas, destacando as possibilidades de construção das representações cartográficas através de experiências espaciais como uma crítica do planejamento capitalista do espaço. Tal perspectiva tem uma profunda ligação com o método dialético, bem como com a crítica das vanguardas artísticas na virada do século XIX para o século XX, em suas representações do espaço apoiadas nas geometrias não-euclidianas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".