MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Radial Glia and Cell Heterogeneity Across The Lizard Central Nervous System: Distal Spinal Cord Rupture Does Not Induce a System‐Wide Response

2018· article· en· W3174536609 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rebecca McDonald, Sarah Donato, Laura Austin, Matthew K. Vickaryous

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cordForebrainBiologyCentral nervous systemAnatomyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radial glia are resident neural stem/progenitor cells of the central nervous system of many non‐mammalian species. Radial glia are capable of spontaneously generating new neurons, and are considered to be crucial for both brain development and injury‐mediated regeneration. Recently, radial glia have also been identified in the tail spinal cord of the lizard Eublepharis macularius (the leopard gecko), a species capable of tail spinal cord regeneration. Here, we investigated whether similar populations of radial glia were present within the body spinal cord (bSC) and brain. Using a bromodeoxyuridine pulse‐chase strategy, we determined that label‐retaining cells were found throughout the bSC and the forebrain following a 20‐week chase. Next, we established that populations of cells lining the central canal (of the bSC) and ventricular system (of the brain) express a panel of radial glia markers, including the transcription factor SOX2 and the intermediate filaments GFAP and Vimentin. However, Vimentin expression was conspicuously absent from the diencephalon (except for the hypothalamic eminence), as well as the midbrain and hindbrain. Further, cell populations lining the central canal of the bSC include both radial glia and cells with a neuronal phenotype (as evidenced by expression of the neuronal marker HuCD). An identical diversity of cell types is also reported for in the regeneration‐competent tail spinal cord. Finally, we determined that constitutive proliferation by cells lining the central canal (of the bSC) and the ventricular system (of the forebrain) are essentially unaltered in response to distal central nervous system injury (tail spinal cord rupture as a result of tail loss). Combined, our data demonstrates that radial glia are present throughout the central nervous system of the gecko, that the bSC is essentially identical to that of the tail, and that the bSC and forebrain are resilient to distal spinal cord injuries. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant 400358 (MKV), Canadian Foundation for Innovation Leaders Opportunity Fund 25371(MKV) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms→French-language works237,207→