MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174537726 · doi:10.1161/res.119.suppl_1.31

Abstract 31: First Trimester Human Umbilical Cord Perivascular Cells (FTM HUCPVCs) Show Superior Angiogenic Potential in Angiogenic Potency Assays When Compared to Term HUCPVCs and Bone Marrow Stromal Cells

2016· article· en· W3174537726 on OpenAlexaff
Farwah Iqbal, Péter Száraz, Jun Wu, Andrée Gauthier-Fisher, Ren‐Ke Li, Clifford Librach

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrigelUmbilical cordMesenchymal stem cellStromal cellBone marrowMedicineAndrologyAngiogenesisCord bloodImmunologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cell therapy employing pro-angiogenic cell types is a promising option for promoting revascularization of ischemic tissues. First trimester human umbilical cord perivascular cells (FTM HUCPVCs) are a young source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) that support blood vessels in the umbilical cord. Objective: We aimed to determine the angiogenic potential of FTM HUCPVCs using angiogenic potency assays and compare to older sources of MSCs: term HUCPVCs and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Methods: For the aortic ring assay, aortas were sectioned and embedded into Matrigel™. Fluorophore-labeled MSCs for testing were added to developing endothelial networks (Day0). MSC integration and network development were monitored by microscopy and quantification of endothelial networks was performed using ImageJ™ software (Day4) n=3. Using the Matrigel™ plug assay, 5.0 x10 5 MSCs were suspended with equal volumes of Matrigel™ and injected subcutaneously in 11-week-old nude mice and isolated after two weeks. Plug associated microvasculature was imaged and quantified n=3. Results: In the aortic ring assay, FTM HUCPVCs homed to endothelial networks and demonstrated greater endothelial cell coverage, when compared to term HUCPVCs and BMSCs. FTM HUCPVCs showed significantly greater network growth when compared to term HUCPVCs ( p ≤0.001), BMSCs ( p ≤0.001) and untreated endothelial networks ( p ≤0.001). FTM HUCPVC contributed to a significantly greater number of closed loops when compared to term HUCPVCs ( p ≤0.01), BMSCs ( p ≤0.001) and untreated networks ( p ≤0.05). At two weeks following injection of Matrigel plugs, FTM HUCPVC resulted in significantly greater blood vessel recruitment when compared to term HUCPVCs ( p ≤0.05), BMSCs ( p ≤0.01) and control media plugs ( p ≤0.01). Small tortuous blood vessels were found in significantly higher quantity in FTM HUCPVC injected plugs when compared to term HUCPVCs ( p ≤0.05), BMSCs (p ≤0.01) and media plugs ( p ≤0.001). Conclusions: These studies demonstrate that FTM HUCPVCs have superior potential to augment, both the initiation of capillary formation and the development of functional, perfusable blood vessels, highlighting their potential for tissue regeneration following ischemic injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207