Mitochondrial genome and phylogenomic analysis of <i>Pseudo-nitzschia micropora</i> (Bacillariophyceae, Bacillariophyta)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The number of species in the genus Pseudo-nitzschia has increased to 56, including 26 species known to produce domoic acid (DA), which is harmful to marine animals and human health. The lack of genomic sequences of Pseudo-nitzschia species has been a limiting factor in the studies of genetic and evolutionary relationships of Pseudo-nitzschia species. Here, the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Pseudo-nitzschia micropora was determined for the first time, which was 38,792 bp in length with the overall AT content being 69.98%. The mitochondrial genome encoded 62 genes, including 36 protein-coding genes (PCGs, including orf157), 24 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes and two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. Phylogenetic tree analysis suggests that the P. micropora had a closer relationship with P. cuspidate than that with P. multiseries. The availability of the complete mitochondrial genome of P. micropora would be useful for researching the evolutionary relationships of Pseudo-nitzschia species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".