MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3174676698 · doi:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_2.430

Abstract 430: Variation of Post Arrest Survival to Discharge and Cerebral Performance Category 1/2 in State of Michigan

2019· article· en· W3174676698 on OpenAlexaff
David Berger, Nai‐Wei Chen, Joseph Miller, Robert D. Welch, Joshua C. Reynolds, James Pribble, Robert A. Swor

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurvival rateHospital dischargeSurvival analysisCardiopulmonary resuscitationEmergency medicineResuscitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requires success in the entire chain of survival. Our prior work demonstrated substantial variation in provision of left heart catheterization (LHC) and TTM within Michigan (MI) hospitals but did not evaluate impact on survival. The objective of this study is to characterize the variation in post arrest survival to discharge and CPC-1/2 in MI Hospitals. Methods: We used the MI Cardiac Arrest to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry, to analyze all adult OHCA patients with ROSC from 2014 - 2017 that survived to hospital admission. Hospitals (N=40) were included if they managed > 30 cases/4-years for all rhythms and > 20 cases/4-years for shockable patients. We excluded transferred patients; those resuscitated with bystander CPR only and patients < 18 years old. We assessed provision of LHC and TTM by hospital, survival to hospital discharge and survival with good neurologic outcome (CPC 1 or 2). We report crude and adjusted survival rates by hospital with median and range. To account for variations between hospitals, the adjusted survival rates were estimated using multilevel multi-variable regression analyses, adjusting for OHCA variables predictive of survival. Results: There were 5486 patients included CARES patients, 4,715 ultimately included for analyses of survival to discharge and survival with good neurological outcome. Of included hospitals (N=40), the median of crude rate was 31.4% [Range: 12.5%, 51.9%] for survival at discharge and 25.1% [Range: 5.2%, 42.2%] for survival rate with CPC-1/2. In the multivariable analyses, adjusting for patient characteristics, the median of adjusted rate was 27.6% [Range: 18.1%, 42.0%] for survival and 21.3% [Range: 9.7%, 32.8%] for survival to discharge with CPC-1/2. Conclusion: We observed substantial disparities in inter-hospital rates of survival at discharge, with a 4-fold range of survival and 8-fold range of survival with CPC-1/2. This survival variation was ameliorated but still persisted in the adjusted modeling analysis. Variation in post arrest survival by hospital is not explained by patient and arrest characteristics, and identifies a need for hospital quality improvement activities to improve post arrest patient survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→