MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The <i>PAX‐5</i> transcript is submitted to 3'UTR editing which regulates its oncogenic expression in cancer cells

2018· article· en· W3174685810 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gilles A. Robichaud, Annie‐Pier Beauregard, Roxann Guérrette, Nicolas Crapoulet, Nicolas Finn, Ève St‐Hilaire

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsAtlantic Cancer Research InstituteUniversité de Moncton
FundersBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
KeywordsBiologyCancerCancer researchUntranslated regionmicroRNAThree prime untranslated regionPolyadenylationOncogeneAlternative splicingRNA splicingCancer cellGene expressionGeneMessenger RNAGeneticsRNACell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pax‐5 oncogene is a major factor in various cancer lesions such as hematopoietic cancers. Recently, we have also shown that Pax‐5 regulates breast cancer phenotypic transitioning processes (EMT‐MET) leading to the regulation of cancer cell malignancy. To date, the aberrant expression of Pax‐5 in cancer cells is still unknown. Our team has thus turned its attention to the post‐transcriptional regulation of Pax‐5 expression by important regulatory elements such as miRNAs and alternative polyadenylation (APA). Upon our analysis of the Pax‐5 transcript in Pax‐5 bearing cells (breast epithelia and B lymphocytes), we found that not only is the 3'UTR submitted to APA; but also, alternative splicing of the Pax‐5 mRNA 3'UTR. Interestingly, upon rapid amplification of cDNA ends (3'RACE) from polysomal fractions, we found that Pax‐5 3'UTR shortening correlates with increased translation frequency. These observations were also validated using reporter gene assays where various truncated 3'UTRs cloned downstream of a luciferase gene resulted in differentially translational expression. More importantly, we also found that Pax‐5 transcripts characterized with shorter 3'UTRs were also associated with advanced staging of hematopoietic cancer lesions. Our findings identify novel molecular mechanisms, which account for Pax‐5 aberrant expression and function in cancer cells. These findings will further elucidate Pax‐5 ‐mediated cancer processes and may provide new avenues for therapeutic intervention. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by grants from the New Brunswick (NB) Innovation Foundation, the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, the Canadian Breast Cancer Society/QEII Foundation, the NB Health Research Foundation and by the Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→