MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174702077 · doi:10.1007/s42081-021-00129-9

The XGTDL family of survival distributions

2021· article· en· W3174702077 on OpenAlexaff
Gilbert MacKenzie, Milica Bucknall, Yasin Al-tawarah, Defen Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of LimerickIrish Research eLibrary
KeywordsCovariateLogistic regressionParametric modelParametric statisticsExtension (predicate logic)Scale (ratio)Proportional hazards modelMathematicsSurvival functionStatisticsFunction (biology)EconometricsLog-logistic distributionScale parameterSurvival analysisApplied mathematicsComputer scienceProbability density functionGeographyCumulative distribution function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Non-PH parametric survival modelling is developed within the framework of the multiple logistic function. The family considered comprises three basic models: (a) a PH model, (b) an accelerated life model and (c) a model which is non-proportional hazards and non-accelerated life. The last model, the generalised time-dependent logistic model was described first by the author in 1996 and this model gives its name to the entire family. The family is generalised by means of a Gamma frailty extension which is shown to accommodate crossing hazards data. A further generalisation is the inclusion of a dispersion model. These extensions lead naturally to the concept of a multi-parameter regression model described by Burke and MacKenzie in which the scale and shape parameters are modelled simultaneously as functions of covariates. Where possible, we include the MPR extension in the XGTDL family. Following a simulation study, the new models are used to analyse two sets survival data and the methods are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Statistics and Data ScienceSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207