MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Non-Hospitalized Patients with Acute COVID-19 Suffer Long-Term Symptoms

2021· article· en· W3174786333 on OpenAlexaff
Maia P. Smith, A. Dean Befus, Ronald W. Damant, Giovanni Ferrara, Desi P. Fuhr, Michael K. Stickland, Rhea Varughese, Gary Lam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWheezeSpirometryChest painQuality of life (healthcare)Vital capacityAsthmaPhysical therapyNeurocognitiveVisual analogue scaleInternal medicinePediatricsLungLung functionCognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Little is known regarding the long-term impact of acute COVID-19 in patients who did not require hospitalization with the acute infection. METHODS: Between June-November 2020, we reviewed patients in our dedicated COVID-19 “long haulers” clinic for those suffering persistent symptoms following recovery from COVID-19 infection. We prospectively collected the following data: pulmonary function test (Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC);6 minute walk test (6MWT);modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score;and health related quality of life (HRQL) using the Post-COVID-19 Functional Scale (PCFS) and EQ5D-5L questionnaires. All data is presented as mean±standard deviation.RESULTS: 17 patients [3 (17.6%) male] aged 49.2(11.7) years were assessed 105.1(41.4) days from molecular diagnosis of acute COVID-19. Four (23.5%) patients had a pre-morbid diagnosis of asthma. None were current smokers;6 (35.3%) were ex-smokers with a 4.2(4.5) pack year history. 17 (100%) reported at least one respiratory symptom (cough, wheeze, or dyspnea);9 (52.9%) described muscular pain or fatigue;8 (47%) reported chest pain;5 (29.4) reported neurocognitive symptoms (new or worsened headache, word finding difficulties or memory impairment) and 5 (29.4) also described fatigue. Despite an impaired mMRC score 1.9(1.6) and desaturation during the 6-minute walk test, spirometry was normal (Table 1). Patients reported an impaired health related quality of life with an EQ5D-5L Visual analogue score of 67.9(21.2);the mean normal for Albertans in the same matched age group 45-64 years is 76.3(17.9). The PCFS score remained elevated over 3 months' from confirmation of the acute infection 1.94(1.1).CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the severity of acute COVID-19 infection, patients may experience chronic persistent symptoms and impaired HRQL necessitating long-term follow up. r> TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics at first clinic visit 105.1(41.4) days following confirmed acute COVID-19 infection. All data presented as mean±standard deviation. [FEV1= Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second;FVC= Forced Vital Capacity;6MWT= 6-minute walk test;mMRC = modified Medical Research Council;EQ5D-5L VAS= EQ5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→