MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174792257 · doi:10.1109/icfec51620.2021.00011

CHANGE: Delay-Aware Service Function Chain Orchestration at the Edge

2021· article· en· W3174792257 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Wang, Mahdi Dolati, Majid Ghaderi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingOrchestrationEdge computingVirtual networkScalabilityDistributed computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkLatency (audio)Service (business)Network Functions VirtualizationOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Mobile Edge Computing (MEC), the network's edge is equipped with computing and storage resources in order to reduce latency by minimizing communication with remote clouds. However, the available computing capacity at the edge is limited compared to that of remote clouds. A promising solution for efficient utilization of the limited capacity at the edge is fine-grained processing of user demands via Virtual Network Functions (VNFs). In this approach, user service demands are expressed as Service Function Chains (SFCs), which are composed of virtual network functions. Such service composition allows constituent VNFs to be flexibly deployed at the edge or in the cloud such that the service latency is minimized. The increasing number of users, however, challenges the scalability of system-managed SFC orchestration. To address this problem, we propose a user-managed online SFC orchestration framework at the edge of the network, called CHANGE, that minimizes service latency by jointly considering the effect of user mobility, edge capacity and service migration. We first present the theoretical foundations of CHANGE and then evaluate its performance via model-driven simulations and realistic Mininet-WiFi emulations. Our results show that CHANGE can improve latency performance by nearly 20% compared to other approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207