MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174835987 · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117057

Gondwana's interlinked peripheral orogens

2021· article· en· W3174835987 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter A. Cawood, Erin L. Martin, J. Brendan Murphy, Sergei Pisarevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth and Planetary Science Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
KeywordsRodiniaGondwanaSupercontinentGeologyPaleontologySubductionLaurentiaOrdovicianRiftTectonicsCraton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After its Ediacaran-Early Cambrian assembly, Gondwana was flanked by a system of peripheral orogens, Terra Australis, Avalonian-Cadomian and newly defined North Indo-Australie, which display broad temporal correlations of their lithotectonic records. Prior to assembly, their initial histories were primarily controlled by the early Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia with second order variances reflecting the differing relationships of their basement continental blocks to that supercontinent. The Terra Australis Orogen developed on basement blocks that previously occupied interior locations within Rodinia and initial successions record development of a passive continental margin. The North Indo-Australie orogen records a similar history of passive margin development, but at least its Indian portion was likely separate from Rodinia. The basement blocks of the Avalonian-Cadomian Orogen previously occupied exterior locations around Rodinia with initial successions indicating the development of a convergent plate margin. As Gondwana assembled, Avalonian-Cadomian convergence terminated at about the same time as convergence commenced in the Terra Australis and North Indo-Australie orogens. The absence of a complete long-lived contemporaneous subduction girdle around Gondwana likely prevented its breakup, in contrast to Rodinia and Pangea, in which the presence of subduction girdles corresponds with lithospheric extension across the supercontinents as a precursor to their ultimate breakup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth and Planetary Science LettersSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207