Influence of the liner-type treatment on the trailing-edge noise generated by a flat plate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several liner-type treatments (three different rectangular grooves covered by three different low porosity wire-mesh screens) on the trailing edge of a flat plate have been investigated in the anechoic wind-tunnel of Université de Sherbrooke. Far-field acoustic directivity measurements have been achieved at Reynolds numbers based on the plate length from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text], yielding radiation maps of all possible liner combinations that are then compared to the reference solid flat plate and to the plate with inserts alone. Noise from the flat plate corresponds to dipolar trailing-edge scattering with an extra shallow hump attributed to the unsteady flow recirculation behind the thick plate. When grooves are added, the latter contribution is amplified and additional cavity noise is observed with several tones and humps. The tones are shown to be resonance between high order modified Rossiter modes and cavity depthwise modes. The hump is a combination of drag dipoles and cavity monopoles from the groove row. The addition of screens always reduces the amplification of the dipolar edge scattering but exhibits very different non-linear responses for the cavity noise. The combination screen with the smallest cells and the insert with the shallowest cavities (corresponding to the same type of treatment applied previously on the Controlled-Diffusion airfoil) yields the lowest levels overall, while the screen with intermediate cell size almost always triggers noise amplification and the screen with a coarse mesh has an intermediate behavior. At high frequencies, the previously reported roughness noise is also observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it