Dopamine D1 receptor activation and cAMP/PKA signalling mediate Brd4 recruitment to chromatin to regulate gene expression in rat striatal neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The activity of striatal medium-spiny projection neurons is regulated by dopamine acting principally at D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is a Gα s/olf -coupled GPCR which activates a cAMP/PKA/DARPP-32 signalling cascade that increases excitability and facilitates plasticity, partly through the regulation of transcription. Transcriptional regulation downstream of the D1R involves the activation of PKA, which can translocate to the nucleus to phosphorylate various targets. The chromatin reader Brd4 regulates transcription induced by neurotrophic factors in cortical neurons and has also been implicated in dopamine-dependent striatal functions. Brd4 is activated by phosphorylation; this facilitates its binding to acetylated histones at promoters and enhancers. In non-neuronal cells, Brd4 is recruited to chromatin in response to PKA signalling. However, it is unknown whether Brd4 is involved in transcriptional activation by the D1R in striatal neurons. Here, we demonstrate that cAMP/PKA signalling increases Brd4 recruitment to dopamine-induced genes in striatal neurons, and that knockdown or inhibition of Brd4 modulated D1R-induced gene expression. Specifically, inhibition of Brd4 with the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 suppressed the expression of ∼25% of D1R-upregulated genes, while increasing the expression of a subset of immediate-early genes, including Fos and Jun . This pro-transcriptional effect of JQ1 was P-TEFb-dependent, and mediated through inhibition of the BD1 bromodomain of Brd4. Finally, we report that JQ1 treatment downregulated expression of many GPCRs and also impaired ERK1/2 signalling in striatal neurons. Our findings identify Brd4 as a novel regulator of D1R-dependent transcription and delineate complex bi-directional effects of bromodomain inhibitors on neuronal transcription.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".