MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175088340 · doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp444

Abstract WP444: Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction is Associated with Large Acute Cerebral Infarcts in Older Adults Following Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

2017· article· en· W3175088340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tania Giovannetti, Catherine C. Price, Molly Fanning, Steven R. Messé, Sarah J. Ratcliffe, Abigail C. Lyon, Scott E. Kasner, Gregory Seidel, Michel Bilello, Joseph E. Bavaria, Wilson Y. Szeto, W. Clarke Hargrove, Michael A. Acker, Thomas F. Floyd

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeStroke (engine)StenosisCardiologyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineAortic valve replacementCognitive declineSurgeryCognitive impairmentDiseaseDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) for calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with high rates of perioperative clinical stroke and “silent” acute cerebral infarcts (SACI) in older adults. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of clinical stroke and acute infarcts on cognitive outcomes. Methods: 129 elderly surgical AVR (age=74.7±6y) participants underwent perioperative evaluations by neurologists and post-surgical diffusion-weighted MRI during the first week post-op. Clinical assessments and MRI’s were reviewed by vascular neurologists, and participants were classified as having clinical stroke, SACI, or no stroke. Trained coders quantified all acute lesions on MRI (lesion number, lesion volume). Participants also completed cognitive testing at baseline, 4-6 weeks, and 1 year. The incidence of post-operative cognitive disorder (POCD) was identified using reliable change index scores calculated in reference to a comparison group of 154 nonsurgical participants with vascular disease. Results: Surgical participants who had a perioperative clinical stroke (n=34) had the largest infarct volume and performed worse than participants with SACI (n=59) and those without stroke on cognitive testing at baseline and at 4-6 weeks post-surgery (p < .05 for all). Among participants who showed an acute infarct on postop MRI (i.e., clinical stroke + silent stroke, n = 93), total acute infarct volume but not infarct number was significantly correlated with cognitive outcomes at 4-6 weeks and 1 year (r > .27 for all). Surgical participants with POCD (12.2% at 4-6 weeks; 9.2% at 1 year) were older, more likely to have had a perioperative clinical stroke, and had more and larger acute infarcts on MRI than surgical participants without POCD (p <.05 for all). Conclusions: Cognitive outcomes and POCD are significantly associated with perioperative clinical stroke and volume of acute infarct on MRI. However, surgical participants who demonstrate small, SACI show good cognitive outcomes that are comparable to participants without perioperative infarct. Low baseline cognitive function may be a risk marker for perioperative stroke and poor cognitive outcomes in the elderly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→