MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Leptin Stabilizes Breathing but does not affect CO <sub>2</sub> Chemosensitivity in Newborn Rat Pups

2018· article· en· W3175113210 on OpenAlexaff
Liran Tamir Hostovsky, Julijana Ivanovska, Jaques Belik, Gaspard Montadon, Estelle B. Gauda

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlethysmographApneaLitterMedicineInternal medicineLeptinEndocrinologyRespiratory systemRoom air distributionSalineVentilation (architecture)Coefficient of variationAnesthesiaAnimal scienceChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature infants have periodic breathing (PB) and chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) that increases during the 2 nd week of life. Leptin (LEP) is a hormone produced by adipocytes and increases central CO 2 chemoreceptors sensitivity. LEP is also produced by the placenta, and in newborn infants LEP levels are highest at birth and then rapidly fall. We hypothesis that the fall in LEP after birth is associated with the increase frequency of PB and apnea leading to CIH during the 2 nd week of life in premature infants. Objective To determine the effect of exogenous LEP on breathing stability and CO 2 sensitivity during the first week of postnatal life, using whole body flow‐through plethysmograph in freely behaving newborn rats. Methods Sprague Dawley (SD) rat pups remained with the nursing dam until the time of the experiment. On postnatal day (PD) 7, rat pups were injected intraperitoneally with either vehicle (saline/n=5), LEP6 (6 μg/gr/n=4) and LEP9 (9 μg/gr/n=5). After injection the pup was returned to nursing dam and litter mates for 30 mins followed by 30 mins in the plethysmograph prior to recording. Respiratory tracings were captured using PowerLab 8 data acquisition system (ADInstruments) and analyzed using LabChart. Ventilatory parameters; frequency, V T and V e were compared during 21% O 2 , 40% O 2 /0% CO 2 , 40%O 2 /5%CO 2 and return to 40%O 2 /0%CO 2, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for V e was calculated for each condition in the 3 treatment groups (SAL, LEP6, LEP9). Results Similar to Stunden et al. in rat pups at PD 7–8 ( Stunden et al,, Respir Physiol, 2001 ), frequency, V T and V e did not significantly changed in response to hypercapnia (P=0.511), and LEP6 or LEP9 did not alter this response. However, LEP exposure did stabilize breathing with a reduction in the CV during 21%O 2 , 40%O 2 /0%CO 2 and 40%O 2 /5%CO 2 (Figure 1). Conclusion Our preliminary findings are consistent with that of Stunden et al, who reported no change in V e in response to hypercapnia at PD 6–8 in SD rats. At this age, the hypothalamus is insensitive to the effect of leptin on feeding and metabolism ( MacKay H et al., Mol Metab. 2014 ). Here we show that leptin does not induce nor augment CO2 chemosensitivity in newborn rats at PD7, but does at PD 18 (Gauda et al, unpublished data), and adults ( Isono S et al., Anesthesiology, 2009 ). However our data does show that leptin stabilizes breathing during the first week of life in newborn rat pups. We speculate that unstable breathing that occurs in premature infants may be associated with the precipitous fall in leptin levels after birth. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→