MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural‐functional studies of purified transmembrane segment VI‐VII of the human isoform 1 of the Na <sup>+</sup> /H <sup>+</sup> exchanger

2012· article· en· W3175114525 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Alves, Brian Lee, Brian D. Sykes, Larry Fliegel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon Transport and Channel Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryGene isoformTransmembrane domainMaltose-binding proteinTransmembrane proteinHelix (gastropod)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyExtracellularCleavage (geology)Amino acidBiochemistryFusion proteinCrystallographyStereochemistryRecombinant DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Na + /H + exchanger isoform 1 (NHE1) is a ubiquitous pH membrane protein in mammalian cells. NHE1 regulates intracellular pH exchanging one intracellular H + for one extracellular Na + . Though the structure of membrane proteins is highly desirable, expression remains problematic. In this study we expressed and purified transmembrane (TM) VI‐VII of the NHE1 protein. A 49 kDa Maltose‐Binding‐Protein‐TMVI‐VII fusion protein was expressed in E. coli XL1 Blue cells and purified with an Amylose resin. After cleavage with Tobacco Etch Virus, free TM VI‐VII, 6.2 kDa protein was isolated and purified by reverse phase HPLC. The identity was confirmed by Mass Spectroscopy. The structure of 15 N isotopically labeled TM VI‐VII peptide was determined in dodecylphosphocholine micelles using solution‐state 2D and 3D NMR. TM VI‐VII contains a helix‐kink‐helix structure for TM VI with helices between amino acids 229–236 and 239–247. TM VII was a continuous helix from 252–274. The data suggests that the C‐terminal half of TM VI interacts with the N‐terminal half of TM VII. Future studies are further defining the helix‐helix interface between residues of TM VI and TM VII.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicIon Transport and Channel RegulationFrench-language works237,207