MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175181419 · doi:10.1101/2021.07.02.450638

Extracellular ribosomal RNA provides a window into taxon-specific microbial lysis

2021· preprint· en· W3175181419 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Xu Zhong, Jennifer Wirth, Amy M. Chan, Curtis A. Suttle

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHakai Institute
KeywordsLysisBiologyRibosomal RNATaxonRNAAbundance (ecology)EcologyGeneticsBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microbes are by far the dominant biomass in the world’s oceans and drive biogeochemical cycles that are critical to life on Earth. The composition of marine microbial communities is highly dynamic spatially and temporally, with consequent effects on their functional roles. In part, these changes in composition result from viral lysis, which is taxon-specific and estimated to account for about half of marine microbial mortality. Here we determined taxon-specific cell lysis of prokaryotes in coastal seawater by sequencing extracellular and cellular ribosomal RNA (rRNA). We detected lysis in about 15% of the 16946 prokaryotic amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) identified, and lysis of up to 34% of the ASVs within a water sample. High lysis was most commonly associated with rare but typically highly productive bacteria, while relatively low lysis was more common in taxa that are often abundant, consistent with the proposed model of “kill the winner”, and the idea that less abundant taxa generally experience higher relative lysis than dominant taxa. These results provide an explanation to the long-standing conundrum of why highly productive bacteria that are readily isolated from seawater are often in very low abundance. One Sentence Summary Extracellular rRNA shows wide variation in cell lysis among prokaryotic taxa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactions→French-language works237,207→