MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175404185 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.30.450538

A supergene in seaweed flies modulates male traits and female perception

2021· preprint· en· W3175404185 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesHelge Ax:son Johnsons Stiftelse
KeywordsSupergene (geology)GeneAlleleMate choiceMatingSexual selectionAdaptation (eye)Tandem exon duplicationPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Supergenes, tightly linked allelic combinations that underlie complex adaptive phenotypes represent a critical mechanism protecting intra-specific polymorphism [1, 2]. Supergenes represent some of the best examples of balancing selection in nature and there is increasing evidence that disassortative mating, when individuals preferentially mate with dissimilar phenotypes, is a key force stabilizing supergene polymorphisms. Yet, the underlying biological mechanisms and genetic basis of disassortative mating remain poorly known. Here, we examine a possible mechanism of disassortative mating driven by female mate choice in relation to the overdominant Cf-Inv(1) supergene in the seaweed fly Coelopa frigida by investigating chemical communication and its genomic architecture. We show that Cf-Inv(1) strongly affects chemical signaling; cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) composition differed between genotypes in males but not females across two continents. In tandem, Cf-Inv(1) affected female perception of these compounds; females are able to sense 36 compounds from the male CHC cocktail but show differential perception between genotypes for almost half of them. This indicates that the genetic underpinnings of male traits and female perceptions are tightly linked within Cf-Inv(1) which likely facilitates disassortative mating [3]. A differential expression approach based on candidate genes for CHC biosynthesis and odorant detection revealed differential expression for CHC biosynthesis in males alone but broad changes in odorant receptors across both sexes. Furthermore, odorant genes clustered together within Cf-Inv(1) , with some of them differing between arrangements by 8.3% at the protein level, suggesting evolution via tandem duplication then divergence. We propose that the tight linkage between overdominant loci, male traits, and female perception has helped to maintain the Cf-Inv(1) polymorphism across its range in the face of supergene degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→