MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effects of Physical Activity and Omega 3 Fatty Acids on Glucose Levels and Neuropathy Symptoms in Hispanic Diabetics in the “En Balancé Plus” Study

2018· article· en· W3175496296 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dipal Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusGlycemicInternal medicinePopulationDietingPhysical therapyType 2 diabetesDiabetic neuropathyEndocrinologyObesityWeight loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Diabetes is an important global public health burden. In the U.S., 8.3% of the population (i.e. 25.8 million individuals) have diabetes. Hispanic Americans have a higher prevalence of diabetes at 11.8% compared to non‐Hispanic whites. People with type‐2 diabetes often have developed an intolerance to insulin. For these individuals, healthy dieting and exercise, insulin therapy and proper medication will help to control and treat their diabetes. If not treated early, then diabetes affects many major organs, including the heart, blood vessels, nerves, eyes and kidneys. Controlling blood sugar levels can help prevent these complications. Aerobic and resistance exercise have been shown to be the most effective exercise regimen for diabetics to reduce neuropathy symptoms and lower glycemic levels, and slow down the damage to other organs. Omega 3 fatty acids have been shown to be effective in decreasing glucose levels as well. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of physical activity and omega 3 fatty acid intake on the hemoglobin A1C levels and neuropathy symptoms in Hispanic diabetic patients. Methods Prospective three‐month study with 40 participants (male=16, female= 24). To evaluate the physical activity, participants were surveyed using the Arizona Physical Activity Frequency questionnaire at baseline and three months. The pain intensity of the participants was measured at baseline and three month using the short form of the McGill pain questionnaire which displayed a pain diagram. Both questionnaires were administered in Spanish. A 12‐hour fasting was required for the blood glucose concentration and lipid profiles which were analyzed. The fasting glucose levels and hemoglobin A1C levels were evaluated at the blood draw clinic and later analyzed at the Loma Linda University Medical Center. The participants attended a total of six nutritional and exercise classes conducted in Spanish for a total contact time of approximately 12 hours. The participants were followed up at 3 months. This case‐only design was funded by NIH and approved by the Loma Linda University Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results There was a significant reduction in Hb A1C level (mean= −0.55%, p=0.01), neuropathy pain intensity (mean= −0.29%, p=0.004), glucose intake (mean=−20.67%, p=0.025), and LDL level (mean=−7.2%, p= 0.042), There was a significant reduction in triglyceride values (mean= −4.45%, P=0.06). Total met hours activities were also increase by 0.65%. Conclusion Physical activity was associated with a decrease in A1C levels as well as a decrease in pain intensity and neuropathy symptoms. After the intervention, the glucose levels decreased and the reported neuropathy symptoms had lessened in severity according to the McGill's pain questionnaire. Physical Activity with the combination of omega 3 fatty acid pills could be associated with the decrease in neuropathy symptoms and glucose levels. Support or Funding Information This case‐only design was funded by NIH and approved by the Loma Linda University Institutional Review Board (IRB). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→