A Dynamic Spatio‐Temporal Expression Pattern of FGFR Isoforms During Scleral Ossicle Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are an important family of proteins that play several roles during early vertebrate development. The FGF ligands bind to their membrane bound receptors (FGFRs) and activate downstream signalling pathways. Although the role of FGFRs has been widely studied in the development of endochondral bones, little is known about their role in the development of neural crest derived intramembranous bones. Scleral ossicles are a ring of 13–15 neural crest derived intramembranous bones in the eye of the chicken ( Gallus gallus ) and have been identified as a model for intramembranous bone formation. These bones are induced by a corresponding ring of epithelial thickenings, the conjunctival papillae. Using whole mount in situ hybridization, the spatio‐temporal expression patterns of ‘b’ and ‘c’ isoforms of FGFR s1–3 were determined during the stages of conjunctival papillae (HH30–33) as well as scleral ossicle development (HH34–37). The expression of both ‘b’ and ‘c’ isoforms of FGFR s1–3 were observed during conjunctival papillae development and their downregulation was observed during the stages of scleral ossicle induction. ImageJ was further used to study changes in the intensity of expression and to give a more precise indication of the stages of downregulation for each gene. Additionally, although all FGFRs were expressed in the epithelium, only FGFR s 1c, 2c, 3b and 3c were observed in the mesenchyme. The dynamic spatio‐temporal expression pattern of the FGFR isoforms during conjunctival papillae development implicates several FGF ligands in conjunctival papillae induction. This research will further our understanding of the signalling pathways potentially involved in the scleral ossicle system. FGF signaling is likely to interact with the Bone Morphogenetic Protein and Hedgehog pathways, already identified to play a role in the scleral ossicle system. Support or Funding Information This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".