MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Potential Influence of Follistatin and Myostatin on Body Composition during the Yukon Arctic Ultra

2018· article· en· W3175618154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Johannsen, Adriane Schalt, Jimin Kim, Richard Chen, Melynda S. Coker, Hanns‐Christian Gunga, Robert H. Coker, Mathias Steinach

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Loan Repayment
KeywordsFollistatinBioelectrical impedance analysisAnimal scienceMyostatinFat massBody mass indexMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective The objective of this study was to determine the potential roles of follistatin and myostatin on body composition under conditions of prolonged physical activity, chronic cold exposure and remote isolation. Methods Participants traveling on foot in the 2017 Yukon Arctic Ultra 692‐km (430‐mile) were recruited for the study. Measurements and samples were obtained at pre‐event, mile 173 at Carmacks checkpoint 1 (C1), mile 239 at Pelly Crossing (C2) and post‐event. Body composition measurements were obtained using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Wrist worn accelerometer devices were utilized to provide an estimation of caloric expenditure and dietary recall provided an assessment of caloric intake. Blood serum samples were collected, centrifuged on‐site, frozen and later analyzed using enzyme linked immunosorbent assays to determine myostatin and follistatin concentrations. Results were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA, presented as means±SEM and considered significant at P<0.05 . Results Ten participants (37±10 yr, body mass index: 24.4±2.6 kg/m 2 ; 8 males, 2 females) were recruited, and five male participants completed the entire event in 260±9 hours. Caloric intake/expenditure was 4,244±471 kcal/day and 6,669±427 kcal/day, respectively, indicating a caloric deficit of 2,425±653 kcal/day. Total mass, body mass index and fat mass were reduced at each time point of the event. Fat free mass was unchanged throughout the event (Pre‐event: 60±3 kg, C1: 60±3 kg, C2: 60±3 kg, Post‐event: 59±1 kg). Follistatin was increased at C1 (1,715±310 pg/mL) in comparison to all other time points. Myostatin trended towards an increased level at C1 (20,494±5,531 pg/mL). Conclusions Despite a remarkable caloric deficit and extreme cold conditions, fat free mass was preserved in participants traveling on foot in the event. Transient alterations in follistatin and myostatin may occur during chronic exercise and may potentially influence the regulation of lean tissue retention under these conditions. Future studies will be directed at the role of nutrient strategies and sleep deprivation on cytokines and physiological resilience under these conditions. Support or Funding Information Research reported in this publication was primarily supported by the DLR grant 50WB1330. Additional support was also provided by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers UL1GM118991, TL4GM118992, or RL5GM118990. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→