MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

RGS2 gene product from candidate hypertension allele shows decreased plasma membrane association and inhibition of Gq

2008· article· en· W3175623478 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Gu, Sam Tirgari, Scott P. Heximer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRGS2Missense mutationRegulator of G protein signalingMutantAlleleG proteinBiologyCell biologyGeneMutationChemistrySignal transductionGeneticsGTPase-activating protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertension is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in North America. Recent work has identified the Regulator of G‐protein Signaling 2(RGS2) as a candidate gene in the development of hypertension. Specifically, a single nucleotide polymorphism resulting in a missense mutation (R44H) has been correlated with hypertensive patients in a subset of the Japanese population. In our work, we identify the functional characteristics of the R44H mutation and the mechanisms by which they occur. Single cell calcium imaging shows that the mutant protein is less able to inhibit Gq signaling. Previously, we have shown that plasma membrane (PM) localization via RGS‐lipid interactions dependent on the amphipathic alpha helix is important for efficient Gq inhibition. Confocal microscopy of the R44H mutant shows greatly reduced tonic association with the PM. Finally, tryptophan spectroscopy of the helix domain shows an inability to associate with liposomes. In conclusion, we have shown that RGS2 R44H is a poor inhibitor of the M1‐muscarinic receptor and that this reduced function is a result of deficient RGS2‐lipid interactions leading to the inability to associate with the PM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→