Treatment outcomes of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease in lung transplant recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung transplant (LTX) recipients are at risk miscellaneous infections, among whom the clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasingly recognized. Despite anti-mycobacterial therapy becoming standardized worldwide, there is a lack of data on treatment outcomes in LTX recipients who develop NTM-pulmonary disease (PD). We aimed to review the treatment outcomes of NTM-PD among LTX recipients in our center. METHODS: Patients who underwent LTX from January 2013 to December 2014 were consecutively enrolled in the retrospective cohort, with follow-up of data retrieved to December 2017. Clinical and radiological improvement and culture conversion after anti-mycobacterial therapy were reviewed in those who developed post-transplant NTM-PD. RESULTS: Sixteen of 230 LTX recipients developed post-transplant NTM-PD. Ten of 16 patients with post-transplant NTM-PD were treated with macrolide-containing anti-mycobacterial therapy, leading to clinical improvement in 5/10 (50%), radiological improvement in 5/10 (50%) and culture conversion in 6/10 (60%) patients. CONCLUSION: Anti-mycobacterial therapy may relieve pulmonary symptoms and reduce microbial load among individuals with post-transplant NTM-PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".