Effect of preschool childcare on school‐aged children’s adiposity in Quebec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regulated public childcare must follow nutrition and physical activity guidelines, but the impact of public childcare on childhood adiposity is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effects of universal preschool childcare on children's BMI in elementary school in Quebec, Canada, and whether the effects differed in children from more or less advantaged families. METHODS: For 1657 children enrolled in the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (1998-2010), BMI z-scores (BMIz) from 6 to 13 years were regressed on the childcare used from 2 to 5 years, adjusted for pre-childcare variables. Average treatment effects were estimated using the Bayesian multilevel linear regression and g-computation for four childcare profiles: 1) parental care or full-time care (35 hours/week) in a 2) centre-based, 3) regulated home-based or 4) unregulated home-based arrangement. RESULTS: Had all participants attended centre-based care, mean BMIz in kindergarten would have been 0.38 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.23, 0.52), which was 0.40 (95% CrI 0.14, 0.65) SD higher than regulated home-based, 0.20 (95% CrI -0.04, 0.43) SD higher than unregulated home-based and 0.36 (95% CrI 0.11, 0.60) SD higher than parental care. By 12 years, mean BMIz had increased for all childcare profiles, but differences between childcare profiles had diminished. CONCLUSIONS: Although centre-based childcare was associated with an earlier rise in BMI, compared with informal care, it had no large, enduring effect, overall, or for less advantaged children, in particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".