MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175769808 · doi:10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.wp416

Abstract WP416: Specific Transcriptome Response in Neutrophils, Monocytes and Whole Blood in Human Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Ischemic Stroke of Different Etiologies

2020· article· en· W3175769808 on OpenAlexaff
Paulina Carmona-Mora, Bradley P. Ander, Glen C. Jickling, Xinhua Zhan, Farah Hamade, Heather Hull, Eva Ferino, Hajar Amini, Bodie Knepp, Frank R. Sharp, Boryana Stamova

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtiologyTranscriptomeStroke (engine)Whole bloodImmune systemInflammationIntracerebral hemorrhageImmunologyContext (archaeology)BioinformaticsGeneInternal medicineGene expressionBiologySubarachnoid hemorrhageGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding transcriptome changes following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemic stroke (IS) of different etiologies, can lead to a better understanding of the molecular and cellular pathways involved in the response to acute brain injury caused by ICH and IS. We characterized the transcriptomic profiles from ICH and different IS etiologies to identify acute molecular changes in isolated monocytes, neutrophils and in whole blood. Peripheral blood was drawn from ICH (6) and IS (33) cases (cardioembolic, large vessel and lacunar) in the first 30 ± 20 hours post-onset of symptoms. We performed whole-genome RNA sequencing of whole blood (WB), and isolated neutrophils and monocytes. Control cases (10) with vascular risk factors (diabetes and/or hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia) were also included (VRFC). A linear regression model including the interaction diagnosis x sample subtype with p<0.05 and overlap with FDR<0.2, (fold-change>1.2) was used for identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes. Gene ontology and pathway enrichment were performed for investigating the biological context of the DE. We observed specific transcriptional responses for ICH and IS, and within IS etiologies in monocytes, neutrophils and WB. Neutrophils’ response was the strongest with highest number of DE genes in both ICH and IS and its etiologies when compared to VRFC. Most of the changes were cell-type specific and involved immune response and signal transduction pathways. For example, in ICH compared to VRFC, about half of the over-represented pathways were unique to either monocytes or neutrophils. Many pathways over-represented in WB were not over-represented in monocytes or neutrophils, signifying the importance of additional blood cell types in the immune response to ICH and IS. A T-cell receptor gene was DE in WB only, and in opposite directions in ICH and IS when compared to VRFC, thus is a good biomarker candidate. The unique expression changes in neutrophils and monocytes after ICH and IS and its subtypes underscore their involvement in IS and ICH pathophysiology. The large number of unique genes and pathways in whole blood not detected in monocytes or neutrophils signify the contribution of other peripheral blood cell types to the ICH and IS responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207