ESCALADE: A PHASE 3 STUDY OF ACALABRUTINIB IN COMBINATION WITH R‐CHOP FOR PATIENTS ≤65Y WITH UNTREATED NON‐GERMINAL CENTER B‐CELL–LIKE DIFFUSE LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) remains the standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although most patients (pts) can be cured, 35–40% will experience relapsed/refractory disease, leading to poor outcomes in the majority of pts. Covalent irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have shown higher responses in pts with non-germinal center B-cell–like (non-GCB) DLBCL than with GCB DLBCL. In untreated non-GCB DLBCL pts, the phase 3 PHOENIX study (Younes et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1285-95) showed that addition of the BTKi ibrutinib to R-CHOP (R-CHOP-I) did not improve outcomes in the intent-to-treat population. However, pts age <60y treated with R-CHOP-I had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those receiving R-CHOP alone. Acalabrutinib (A) is a second-generation BTKi with enhanced kinase selectivity and potential for better efficacy and tolerability than first-generation BTKis. There is a strong rationale for combining A with R-CHOP in pts with untreated DLBCL, and safety of A + R-CHOP has been shown in a phase 1b/2 study (Davies et al. ASH 2020). The aim of this study is to determine if the addition of A to R-CHOP leads to improved PFS in pts age ≤65y with untreated non-GCB DLBCL. Methods: ESCALADE (ACE-LY-312; NCT04529772) is a phase 3, randomized, global, double-blind study of A vs placebo in combination with R-CHOP for treatment of newly diagnosed non-GCB DLBCL. The study is recruiting adults ≥18y and ≤65y with previously untreated DLBCL stage II–IV disease with a Revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) score of 2–5. Prior to randomization, all pts will receive an initial R-CHOP cycle (cycle 1) as standard-of-care treatment to prevent delays in therapy initiation. Based on central Gene Expression Profile (GEP) testing performed after enrollment, pts with non-GCB DLBCL (activated B-cell like or unclassified) will be randomized into 2 arms to receive A 100 mg twice daily plus R-CHOP or placebo plus R-CHOP from cycle 2 to cycle 6 followed by 2 additional cycles of rituximab + A or placebo (cycles 7 and 8). All pts will receive primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors accompanying all R-CHOP cycles. The study aims to randomize 600 pts (∼300 per arm). The primary objective is to evaluate whether the addition of A to R-CHOP will prolong PFS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, complete response rate, OS, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Key exclusion criteria are central nervous system involvement, primary mediastinal lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, diagnosis or treatment of malignancy other than DLBCL, and history of indolent lymphoma. Approximately 250 sites globally will enroll pts. Enrollment began in Q3 of 2020. EA – previously submitted to ASCO and EHA 2021. The research was funded by: Acerta Pharm, a member of the AstraZeneca Group Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Molecular Targeted Therapies, Ongoing Trials Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract L. H. Sehn Consultant or advisory role: Celgene, AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Janssen, Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Lundbeck, Amgen, Apobiologix, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Merck, Takeda, Teva, AstraZeneca, Acerta Pharma, Morphosys, Incyte, Debiopharm Group, Sandoz-Novartis, Genmab, Verastem Honoraria: Amgen, Apobiologix, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Ortho, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Lundbeck, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Teva, TG Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Acerta Pharma, Morphosys, Incyte, Debiopharm Group, Sandoz-Novartis, Verastem, Genmab, AstraZeneca Research funding: Roche/Genentech, Teva B. Kahl Consultant or advisory role: Celgene, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, Acerta Pharma, ADC Therapeutics, Genentech, Roche, BeiGene, Bayer, MEI Pharma, Kite/Gilead, MorphoSys, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Teva, BMS, Molecular Templates, Incyte Research funding: Genentech, Acerta Pharma, ADC Therapeutics, Celgene Educational grants: Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, AbbVie, Millenium, Seattle Genetics M. Matasar Consultant or advisory role: Genentech, Bayer, Merck, Juno Therapeutics, Roche, Teva, Rocket Medical, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda; Stock ownership: Merck Honoraria: Genentech, Roche, Glaxosmithkline, Bayer, Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Immunovaccine Technologies, Takeda Research funding: Genentech, Roche, Glaxosmithkline, IGM Biosciences, Bayer, Pharmacyclis, Janssen, Rocket Medical, Seattle GEnetics, Immunovaccine Tech Educational grants: Genentech, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Bayer Other remuneration: Expert Testimony: Bayer G. Lentz Consultant or advisory role: Roche/Genentech, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Novartis, Celgene, MorphoSys, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences Honoraria: Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, BMS, MorphoSys, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, AbbVie Research funding: Janssen-Cilag, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Aquinox Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, MorphoSys, Gilead Sciences, Verastem, AGIOS Educational grants: Janssen-Cilag, Celegene, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Other remuneration: Expert Testimony: MorphoSys K. Izutsu Consultant or advisory role: Bayer, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin Honoraria: Takeda, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, MSD, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Mundipharma, HUYA Bioscience International, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Kyowa Kirin, Fujifilm, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Allergan Research funding: Eisai, Chugai Pharma L. Tao Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca R. Calvo Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca Stock ownership: AstraZeneca P. L. Zinzani Consultant or advisory role: Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead, Janseen-Cilag, BMS, Servier, Sandoz, MSD, TG Therapeutics, Takeda, Roche, Eusapharma, Kwoya Kirin, Sanofi, ADC Therapteutics Other remuneration: Speakers’ Bureau - Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead, Janseen-Cilag, BMS, Servier, MSD, TG Therapeutics, Takeda, Roche, Eusapharma, Kyowa Kirin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".