MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

K/BxN‐induced poly‐arthritis is exacerbated by infection with the intestinal helminth parasite <i>Hymenolepis diminuta</i> ; possible involvement of complement and mast cells

2013· article· en· W3175806602 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rabea Graepel, Frank R. Jirik, Keith A. Sharkey, Jason J. McDougall, Derek M. McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyarthritisInflammationMast cellImmunologyArthritisChemistryInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the effect of Hymenolepis diminuta (H.D.) infection on a model of polyarthritis, to determine if helminth therapy modulates joint inflammation. BALB/c mice were untreated or infected with 10 H.D. cysticercoids. After 8 days, polyarthritis was induced and joint swelling was measured for 13 days. At necropsy, joints and serum were collected for analysis. K/BxN treatment induced swelling of all joints compared to vehicle treatment. Front paws and knees of H.D. infected mice were significantly more swollen than those of non‐infected K/BxN‐treated mice. This was accompanied by significant increases in serum complement C5a and mast cell protease‐1 in H.D. + K/BxN‐treated mice on day 2 compared to control and K/BxN‐only treated mice. Thus, exacerbated inflammation is paralleled by evidence of increased mast cell activation in H.D. + K/BxN treated mice. Mast cell activation is crucial in the K/BxN model and increased activation may underlie the exacerbation of disease by H.D.. Our data indicate that autoimmune pathways may be differentially sensitive to helminth therapy. Research was conducted with the support of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada and a CIHR operating grant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→