MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Acute hyperglycemia does not alter central respiratory CO <sub>2</sub> chemoreflex responsiveness

2019· article· en· W3175807855 on OpenAlexafffund
Jordan D. Bird, Alexandra Skalk, Scott F. Thrall, Nicholas D. J. Strzalkowski, Trevor A. Day

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemoreceptorVentilation (architecture)Internal medicineRespiratory systemCarbon dioxideArterial bloodEndocrinologyChemistryRespiratory rateAnesthesiaPeripheral chemoreceptorsRespirationCentral chemoreceptorsMedicineOxygenControl of respirationBlood pressureHeart rateAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The control of breathing is modulated by two distinct but interacting respiratory chemoreceptor compartments: peripheral chemoreceptors (PCRs; carotid bodies) and central chemoreceptors (CCRs; brainstem). The PCRs respond to variety of chemostimuli, including arterial oxygen, arterial carbon dioxide, glucose, insulin and temperature, and are now thought to act as metabolic sensors. However, CCRs have only been characterized as carbon dioxide/acid sensors (PCO 2 /[H + ]). PCRs respond to chemostimulation faster than CCRs, which may mask CCR responses to stimuli like acute hyperglycemia. The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between alterations in blood glucose concentration and central respiratory chemoreflex responsiveness via hyperoxic rebreathing in healthy humans. We hypothesized that experimentally‐induced relative hyperglycemia following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 75g, 300 ml) would (a) increase the rate of CO 2 accumulation during rebreathing and (b) augment central respiratory chemoreflex responsiveness due to a synergistic effect of hyperglycemia on the CO 2 sensitivity of CCR neurons. In 10 healthy participants, we measured minute ventilation (V I ; L/min; pneumotachometer) and end‐tidal carbon dioxide (P ET CO 2 ; Torr; gas analyzer). We used the modified hyperoxic rebreathing test to isolate CCRs and quantify the central chemoreflex responsiveness to increases in metabolically‐derived CO 2 . Blood glucose levels were higher 30‐min following the OGTT beverage (i.e., glucose‐loaded) compared to fasted (7.8±1.1 vs. 4.7±0.4 mmol/L; P<0.0001). During rebreathing, the rate of end‐tidal (P ET )CO 2 accumulation was greater in the glucose loaded trial compared to the fasted trial (0.086±0.007 vs. 0.07±0.008 vs. Torr/sec; P=0.0002). These findings confirm the hyperglycemic stimulation between trials. However, the central respiratory chemoreflex responsiveness during rebreathing was not different between glucose loaded and fasted trials (2.3±1.4 vs. 2.5±1.8 vs. L/min/Torr CO 2 ; P=0.59). These preliminary findings suggest that relative hyperglycemia does not affect the central respiratory chemoreflex responsive to hyperoxic rebreathing. The CCRs may be a more specialized respiratory chemoreceptor, with a phenotype to detect only metabolically‐derived accumulations in CO 2 . Support or Funding Information NSERC Discovery and MRU Faculty of Science and Technology This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→