MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175850450 · doi:10.21199/wb40.4.6

SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE DIET OF THE BARN OWL IN NORTHWESTERN NEVADA

2009· article· en· W3175850450 on OpenAlexaff
Abigail C. Myers, Christopher B. Goguen, Daniel C. Rabbers

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Birds · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsStillwater (Canada)
FundersPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsBarn-owlVariation (astronomy)GeographySeasonalityPhysical geographyEcologyBiologyPredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Barn Owl (Tyto alba) is a widespread predator of small mammals that is declining in many parts of its range. We analyzed the Barn Owl’s diet at Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge, Churchill County, Nevada, by identifying remains in pellets collected during the summer (May–September 2007) and winter (October 2007–February 2008). In 306 pellets (143 from summer, 163 from winter), we identified 796 vertebrate prey items including 9 genera of mammals and several species of birds. At both seasons, mammals, primarily of the genera Microtus (voles), Peromyscus (white-footed mice), Reithrodontomys (harvest mice), and Dipodomys (kangaroo rats) were found in >93% of pellets. Bird remains were found in 15.5% and 11.1% of pellets in summer and winter, respectively. Remains of giant water bugs (family Belostomatidae) were present in 7.7% of summer pellets but absent in winter. Although the diet was dominated by the same five categories of prey (four mammal genera and birds) at both seasons, the proportions of Microtus and Peromyscus declined during the winter, while those of Reithrodontomys and Dipodomys increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern BirdsSame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207