Análisis bio-estratigráfico y microfacial de la formación Zuloaga en la Cañada Alardín, General Zaragoza, Nuevo León, México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre 1994 y 2003 se localizaron en un paraje del Rio Blanco, llamado Canada Alardin, municipio de General Zaragoza, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, ochenta sitios arqueologicos consistentes en concentraciones liticas, cuevas y abrigos rocosos, habitacionales y/o con manifestaciones grafico rupestres, emplazados en la Formacion Zuloaga. En base a ello se lleva a cabo en el area, una investigacion Geo-Arqueologica con el proposito de establecer la secuencia estratigrafica, basada en microfosiles caracteristicos de la Formacion (Fm.) Zuloaga. Se realizaron analisis de estratificacion y de secciones delgadas para identificar las facies y microfacies, para explicar los ambientes de sedimentacion. Abstract Between 1994 and 2003, there were located on a place of the Blanco River, the “Canada Alardin” in General Zaragoza County, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, eighty archaeological sites. These show lithic concentrations, caves, rockshelters, related to habitational use, and ancient graphic manifestations. All of these facts were found in the Zuloaga Formation (Fm.). Based on this data, a Geo-Archaeological investigation was carried out with the purpose of establishing the stratigraphic secuence of the area, distinguishing microfacies and the characteristic micro-fossils association, based on thin sections analysis from the Zuloaga Fm., in order to explaining the depositional environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".