MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175916670 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab145

The effects of smoking on pregnancy risks in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a population-based study

2021· article· en· W3175916670 on OpenAlexaff
Ido Feferkorn, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Ginevra Mills, Haitham Baghlaf, Michael H. Dahan

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryMedicinePregnancyHealthcare Cost and Utilization ProjectGestational diabetesObstetricsPopulationRetrospective cohort studyGynecologyDiabetes mellitusHealth careGestationEnvironmental healthInternal medicineInsulin resistanceEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY QUESTION: Is there is an association between smoking and pregnancy complications in pregnant women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among women with PCOS who smoke. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Smokers are at increased risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Given the common pathophysiology and shared risk factors between type 2 DM and GDM, we sought to assess whether an association between smoking and the development of GDM exists. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective population-based study utilizing data from the HCUP-NIS over 11 years from 2004 to 2014. Pregnant women with PCOS who did smoke were compared to pregnant women with PCOS who did not smoke. A second comparison was made between pregnant smokers with and without PCOS. Of the 443 590 women who smoked during pregnancy and the 14 882 women with PCOS, 631 women were both smokers and diagnosed with PCOS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) is the largest inpatient sample database in the USA and is composed of hospital inpatient stays submitted by hospitals throughout the entire country. Each year, the database provides information relating to 7 million inpatient stays, including patient characteristics, diagnosis and procedures. The data are representative of ∼20% of admissions to US hospitals across 48 states and the District of Columbia. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were no differences in the risks of preterm delivery (aOR1.2; CI 0.8-1.9), placental abruption (aOR1.1; CI 0.4-3.2), pregnancy induced hypertension (aOR1.0; CI 0.7-1.5), rate of operative vaginal delivery (aOR1.5; CI 0.9-2.5) and rates of cesarean section (C/S) (aOR1.0; CI 0.7-1.3) between smoking and non-smoking women with PCOS. A significant association between smoking and GDM was observed in women with PCOS (aOR1.5; CI1.01-2.1). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The limitations of our study are its retrospective nature and the fact that it relies on an administrative database. Data regarding smoking and PCOS diagnosis could be skewed due to patients' underreporting, lack of documentation and documentation differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The public health implications of confirming smoking as a risk for GDM among women with PCOS are many. This can lead to earlier screening in pregnancy of smokers for GDM. Earlier initiation of interventions could decrease fetal complications and possibly have an impact on the life and long-term health of the offspring. Future studies are needed in order to assess whether smoking cessation during pregnancy decreases the risk of GDM in that gestation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used. The authors report no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207