RUF: Effective Sea Ice Floe Segmentation Using End-to-End RES-UNET-CRF with Dual Loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sea ice observations through satellite imaging have led to advancements in environmental research, ship navigation, and ice hazard forecasting in cold regions. Machine learning and, recently, deep learning techniques are being explored by various researchers to process vast amounts of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data for detecting potential hazards in navigational routes. Detection of hazards such as sea ice floes in Marginal Ice Zones (MIZs) is quite challenging as the floes are often embedded in a multiscale ice cover composed of ice filaments and eddies in addition to floes. This study proposes a segmentation model tailored for detecting ice floes in SAR images. The model exploits the advantages of both convolutional neural networks and convolutional conditional random field (Conv-CRF) in a combined manner. The residual UNET (RES-UNET) computes expressive features to generate coarse segmentation maps while the Conv-CRF exploits the spatial co-occurrence pairwise potentials along with the RES-UNET unary/segmentation maps to generate final predictions. The whole pipeline is trained end-to-end using a dual loss function. This dual loss function is composed of a weighted average of binary cross entropy and soft dice loss. The comparison of experimental results with the conventional segmentation networks such as UNET, DeepLabV3, and FCN-8 demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".