MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Role of cystein residues in the normal operation and assembly of K+‐Cl− cotransporter isoform 2 (KCC2)

2012· article· en· W3176080351 on OpenAlexafffund
Gabriel A. Carpentier, Luc Caron, Mariève Jacob‐Wagner, Paul Isenring

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCummings Foundation
KeywordsCotransporterChemistryTransfectionSymporterImmunoprecipitationMutagenesisIntracellularBiochemistryWild typeBiophysicsGene isoformHEK 293 cellsTransport proteinMolecular biologyMutantTransporterBiologyGeneSodium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

K + ‐Cl − cotransporters (KCCs) regulate intracellular K + and Cl − concentration as well as cell volume. Their transport activity is sensitive to N ‐ethylmaleimide (NEM), a thiol reagent that alkylates available sulfhydryl groups, and their C ‐terminus can interact with other CCCs to form oligomers. These features suggest that a number of cystein residues within the KCCs play an important role in carrier activity and/or assembly. To determine whether this is the case, we have exploited a mutagenic approach using rat KCC2 as a model. Substitutions (C8G, C742G, C854G and C982G) were generated by site‐directed mutagenesis and expressed in X. laevis oocytes. Substitution C854G increased while C982G decreased Rb + transport without altering cell surface protein expression. They responded as did wild type (wt) carrier to the inhibitory effect of 250 μM furosemide but were more sensitive to the inhibitory effect of 1 mM NEM. Coimmunoprecipitation studies showed that the quantity of carriers precipitated with wt KCC2 was lower for C854G than for wt KCC2 or C982G. Lastly, FRAP studies in KCC2‐transfected HEK‐293 cells showed that NEM increased post‐bleach fluorescence recovery time in a concentration‐dependent manner. Collectively, the data suggest that C854 and C982 play an important role in KCC2 function, perhaps by supporting homo‐ and/or heterooligomeric structure formation. This work was funded by CIHR and CFI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→