Abstract TP5: Optimizing First Pass TICI 3: FAST (Flow Arrest Aspiration Stentriever Technique)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Timely restoration of cerebral blood flow using mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is constantly evolving. We evaluated the impact of combining distal access catheter with proximal balloon guiding catheter and stentriever technique for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: In accordance with our institutional review board approval, we retrospectively analyzed all the patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with stentriever between May 2011 and June 2019. The patients were divided by the techniques adopted, the combined technique: proximal balloon guiding catheter, distal access catheter and stentriever and the conventional approach: proximal balloon guiding catheter and stentriever. Analysis and outcome parameters: complete recanalization (TICI ≥2b), procedural time, early independent functional outcome (mRS ≤2 at discharge). Results: Among the 267 patients included, in 58.8% the combined technique was performed. Mean age at treatment was 68.4±13.3, 55.4% male. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. Median NIHSS score was 16 (6-34) on arrival. The overall complete recanalization rate was 68.5%. The combined technique group achieved higher complete recanalization rate; TICI ≥2b: 75.6% vs. 66.3% (p=0.001). In addition, the distal access catheter group achieved lower non-reperfusion rate; TICI=0: 15.4% vs. 26.5% (p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in first-pass successful reperfusion rate: 70.5% vs. 64.2% (p=0.333). The distal aspiration approach was not associated with longer procedural time: 67.4±28.4 min vs. 31.8±74.9 min (p=0.467). There were no significant differences regarding procedural complications: 8.3% vs. 7.3% (p=0.763); SICH: 8.5% vs. 12.2% (p=0.333). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes; early functional independence rate: 45.0% vs. 54.3% (p=0.256), mortality rate: 12.8% vs. 15.2% (p=0.256). Conclusions: The combined techniquefor mechanical thrombectomy is associated with higher complete recanalization rate. The use of aspiration system does not seem to increase the procedural time or influence in complications development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".