MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Dose‐Related Effects of Doxorubicin Chemotherapy on Interstitial Amino Acid Concentrations in Skeletal Muscle

2018· article· en· W3176123402 on OpenAlexaff
David A. MacLean, Sergio Fabris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrodialysisAmino acidInterstitial spaceDoxorubicinPharmacologyChemistrySkeletal muscleSalineMetabolismChemotherapyMedicineInternal medicineExtracellularBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a frontline anticancer therapeutic which has proven effective in the treatment of various cancers. However, very little is known regarding the effect that DOX has on SM metabolism, specifically its influence on interstitial amino acid (AA) concentrations. In SM, the interstitial space represents an important active compartment located between the vasculature and the tissue and it has been shown to play a functional role in the regulation and integration of various metabolic substances. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of DOX on interstitial AA concentrations in SM. Rats received a 1.5 or 4.5 mg/kg dose of DOX i.p. and grouped into endpoints every 24 hrs up to 192 hrs. A control group was administered a sham i.p. injection of saline. Total amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA) and branched‐chain amino acids (BCAA) were quantified in the interstitial space. The administration of DOX resulted in a dose‐related difference in interstitial AA. The 1.5 mg/kg dose resulted in a transient increase (P<0.05) in TAA, EAA and BCAA from 24–96 hrs as compared to control. Contrarily, TAA, EAA and BCAA decreased (P<0.05) 24–192 hours following the administration of 4.5 mg/kg DOX as compared to control. This study by way of the microdialysis technique, represents the first time that amino acid concentrations have been quantified in the interstitial space following the administration of a chemotherapeutic drug. In addition, the possibility of a dose‐related effect of DOX on amino acid transport mechanisms from the skeletal muscle compartment into the interstitium/vasculature is of particular interest as this may represent a regulatory mechanism that has not previously been considered. Support or Funding Information Supported by NOSMFA This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology→French-language works237,207→