Relationship between oxidant-antioxidant status and hypercoagulobility indices in children with iron deficiency anaemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidative stress is a potential mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). Although a tendency for hypercoagulability has been reported in IDA, its underlying mechanism is yet to be elucidated. This study investigated the probable relationship between oxidative stress and hypercoagulability in children with IDA. This study included 57 children diagnosed with IDA (IDA group) between October 2016 and October 2017 in addition to 48 healthy children (control group). The maximum clot firmness (MCF) index, and clot formation time (CFT) index, which are indicators of hypercoagulability in rotational thromboelastometry assays [intrinsic TEM (INTEM) and extrinsic TEM (EXTEM)] derived from our previous study, were recorded. Total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and oxidative stress index (OSI) were analysed from serum samples of the individuals. In IDA group, OSI and TOS levels were higher and TAC level was lower compared to the control group (P < 0.001, for all). The EXTEM and INTEM MCF in the IDA group was higher than in the control group, while the INTEM CFT was lower than in the control group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.05, published data).TOS and OSI had a negative correlation with INTEM CFT (r:-0.361, P < 0.001 and r:-0.333, P = 0.001) and a positive correlation with INTEM MCF (r:+0.420, P < 0.001 and r:+0.367, P < 0.001) and EXTEM MCF (r:+0.476, P < 0.001 and r:+0.403, P < 0.001). However, TAC demonstrated no correlation with CFT and MCF index. The oxidant-antioxidant balance is disrupted in favour of oxidative stress in children with IDA. In addition, TOS and OSI, which are parameters of oxidative stress, are correlated with CFT and MCF indices. Oxidative stress appears to be an important factor for the development of tendency to hypercoagulability in IDA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".