MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PROX1 regulation of endothelial cell cycle progression

2009· article· en· W3176216774 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shannon A. Baxter, Krista Herbert, Hae‐Kwang Kim, David Cheung, Jeffrey T. Wigle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic System and Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersManitoba Health Research Council
KeywordsCyclin AE2FCyclin A2BiologyCyclin ECell cycleMolecular biologyCell biologyCyclin D1Cancer researchCellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The homeobox transcription factor PROX1 is necessary for proper lymphatic vessel development. PROX1 upregulates the expression of CYCLIN E1 in both Drosophila melanogaster and mammalian cells. Expression of CYCLIN E1 is controlled by two E2F sites located on either side of the transcriptional start site. We have shown that PROX1 activates a 1 kb Cyclin E1 promoter via a DNA‐binding independent mechanism that requires both E2F sites. We used reporter gene assays to assess PROX1 regulation of Cyclin E1 promoter versions in which the E2F sites were mutated. We infected Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) with adenovirus encoding PROX1, and used bromodeoxyuridine, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and phosphorylated histone H3 staining to quantify changes in cell cycle progression. We used western blotting to measure protein levels of CYCLIN E1. We observed a decrease in the ability of PROX1 to activate a 206 bp Cyclin E1 promoter when either E2F site was mutated. We noted an increase of CYCLIN E1 in PROX1 infected HUVECs as well as an increased number of cells in S phase. In contrast, there was not a corresponding increase of cells in M phase. We have established that both E2F sites are essential for PROX1 mediated activation of the Cyclin E1 promoter. Our studies have discovered a novel role for PROX1 as a transcriptional co‐activator. The National Cancer Institute of Canada and the Manitoba Health Research Council support this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicLymphatic System and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207