MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Caveolin Inclusion Myopathy

2008· article· en· W3176259487 on OpenAlexaff
Bolesław Lach, Mark A. Tarnopolsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCaveolin-1 and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyDesminCytoplasmic inclusionCaveolaeMuscle biopsySarcolemmaAnatomyNemaline myopathyIntermediate filamentNebulinChemistryMuscle weaknessBiologyActinVimentinMyocyteMyopathyCytoplasmBiopsyImmunohistochemistryMedicineCytoskeletonCell biologySkeletal muscleSarcomereCellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We previously reported a new, autosomal dominant or sporadic, proximal myopathy characterized by mild myalgias and muscle weakness, and the presence of intracytoplasmic, hexagonally cross‐linked tubular arrays in type 2 muscle fibres ( Ann Neurol 45:512, 1999). We report the ultrastructural and immunohistochemical characterization of identical inclusions in another patient with an apparent sporadic form of the disease. This 45‐year old male underwent quadriceps femoris muscle biopsy for an upper extremity myalgias and CK activity found at 1,900 (N < 220 iU/L). He had no family history of muscle disease and parents were not consanguineous. Gomori stain revealed rod‐shaped intensely blue cytoplasmic inclusions in type 2 muscle fibres reminiscent of nemaline bodies. Inclusions were strongly positive for caveolin‐3 and negative for desmin, actin, myosin, vimentin, ubiquitin and components of sarcolemma. They displayed characteristic hexagonal crystalloid tubular arrays joined by double bridging arms and were not connected to cytoskeleton or any other organelles. The inclusions were very often surrounded by globular small structures measuring approximately 37 nm and reminiscent of caveolae. This is the first demonstration of chemical nature of the cytoplasmic inclusions in this condition. This disease is probably more common than reported, since the inclusions are very similar to nemaline bodies with light and electron microscopy, and misdiagnosed without grid tilting. At this point, it is not clear whether the underlying process is an excessive formation of caveolae or inability of cell to discharge or degrade caveolin, which conglomerate in the large intracytoplasmic masses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCaveolin-1 and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207