Plasma neurofilament light chain is associated with cognitive decline in non-dementia older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurofilament light chain (NfL) has been associated with cognitive status in multiple neurodegenerative conditions. Studies about plasma NfL and cognitive decline in older adults are still limited. 504 older adults (median age 75 years) who expressed memory complaints were selected from the Multidomain Alzheimer's Preventive Trial (MAPT) and were classified as normal cognition (NC) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cognitive functions were measured as mini mental state examination (MMSE) and composite cognitive score (CCS) over a 4-year period. Plasma NfL was measured at the first or the second year of the MAPT. Mixed-effects linear models were performed to evaluate cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. In the whole population, higher plasma NfL was cross-sectionally associated with lower cognitive functions (MMSE: β = - 0.007, 95% CI [- 0.013, - 0.001]; CCS: β = - 0.003, 95% CI [- 0.006, - 0.001]). In adults with MCI, but not NC, higher plasma NfL was associated with lower CCS at the cross-sectional level (β = - 0.003, 95% CI [- 0.005, - 0.0002]). The upper quartile NfL group further demonstrated more over time decline in CCS (β = - 0.07, 95% CI [- 0.12, - 0.01]) under the MCI status. Plasma NfL can be a promising biomarker of progressive cognition decline in older adults with MCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".