MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vaping During Pregnancy Results in Arterial Stiffness in Offspring

2019· article· en· W3176337565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eiman Aboaziza, Juliana O’Reilly, Josh Moore, Sarah McLaughlin, I. Mark Olfert, Paul D. Chantler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Physiological Society
KeywordsMedicinePulse wave velocityArterial stiffnessOffspringNicotinePregnancyInternal medicineCardiologyPopulationBlood pressurePhysiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic cigarettes (Ecigs) are promoted as effective smoking cessation tools, and consequently widely used among pregnant women who are motivated to quit tobacco cigarette smoking. Emerging evidence demonstrates that Ecigs can be dangerous to cardiovascular health. Babies born to women who vape represent a uniquely vulnerable population for this type of exposure, because they may be adversely impacted during a critical developmental period. It is unknown if cardiovascular harm potential of Ecigs without nicotine is conferred to offspring of vaping mothers. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) provides an indirect measure of arterial stiffness (with stiffer vessels having higher PWV) and can be useful for characterizing cardiovascular disease progression. Sprague‐Dawley rat dams were exposed to either nicotine‐free Ecig vapor (Ecig0, Joyetech eGrip OLED using 5‐sec puffs @17.5 W) or ambient air. Exposure consisted of 20 puffs over 1‐hour each day, 5 days/week, and resulted in an average daily TPM of ~120 mg/m 3 . Maternal exposure started on gestational day 2 and continued until pups were weaned (postnatal day 21). Pups were never directly exposed. Left common carotid arteries (LCCA) of 4‐month old pups (n=5 per group) were noninvasively imaged via Doppler ultrasound. PWV was measured using the regional transit‐time (TT) method ( PWV= Δd/Δt ; where d is distance between proximal (downstream to aortic arch) and distal (upstream of bifurcation) points on the LCCA, and t is the arrival time of pulse wave upstroke relative to R‐wave peak on ECG). Repeated (≥3) measurements were made for each variable and averaged. TT measurements were performed using a Vevo2100 ultra high frequency ultrasound platform with heart rate monitoring system (VisualSonics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada). Results were processed using VisualSonics analysis software. Left common carotid arterial PWV (mean ± SD) in the Ecig0 group (6.6 ± 2 m/s) was significantly higher ( p <0.01) than in the air control group (3.2 ± 0.7 m/s). Offspring exposed to nicotine‐free Ecig vapor in utero had higher PWV than controls, indicating stiffer arteries and an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Further studies will determine the long‐term implications of this vascular impairment. Clinicians and policy‐makers need to be aware of these risks to discourage pregnant women from using Ecigs (with or without nicotine). Support or Funding Information WVU Cancer Institute Philip R Dino Innovative Research Grant (IMO); APS STRIDE Fellowship (JO); AMIF: NIH S10RR026378, P20RR016440, P30GM103488, P20RR016440, P30GM103488 and U54GM104942 (SM) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207