CMOS Time-to-Digital Converters for Biomedical Imaging Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-to-digital converters (TDCs) are high-performance mixed-signal circuits capable of timestamping events with sub-gate delay resolution. As a result of their high-performance, in recent years TDCs were integrated in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology with highly sensitive photodetectors known as single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs), to form digital silicon photomultipliers (dSiPMs) and SPAD imagers. Time-resolved SPAD-based sensors are capable of detecting the absorption of a single photon and timestamping it with picosecond resolution. As such, SPAD-based sensors are very useful in the field of biomedical imaging, using time-of-flight (ToF) information to produce data that can be used to reconstruct high-quality biological images. Additionally, the capability of integration in standard CMOS technologies, allows SPAD-based sensors to provide high-performance, while maintaining low cost. In this paper, we present an overview of fundamental TDC principles, and an analysis of state-of-the-art TDCs. Furthermore, the integration of TDCs into dSiPMs and SPAD imagers will be discussed, with an analysis of the current results of TDCs in different biomedical imaging applications. Finally, several important research challenges for TDCs in biomedical imaging applications are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it