IGANI: Iterative Generative Adversarial Networks for Imputation With Application to Traffic Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing use of sensor data in intelligent transportation systems calls for accurate imputation algorithms that can enable reliable traffic management in the occasional absence of data. As one of the effective imputation approaches, generative adversarial networks (GANs) are implicit generative models that can be used for data imputation, which is formulated as an unsupervised learning problem. This work introduces a novel iterative GAN architecture, called Iterative Generative Adversarial Networks for Imputation (IGANI), for data imputation. IGANI imputes data in two steps and maintains the invertibility of the generative imputer, which will be shown to be a sufficient condition for the convergence of the proposed GAN-based imputation. The performance of our proposed method is evaluated on (1) the imputation of traffic speed data collected in the city of Guangzhou in China, and the training of short-term traffic prediction models using imputed data, and (2) the imputation of multi-variable traffic data of highways in Portland-Vancouver metropolitan region which includes volume, occupancy, and speed with different missing rates for each of them. It is shown that our proposed algorithm mostly produces more accurate results compared to those of previous GAN-based imputation architectures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".