MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Azole‐based heme oxygenase inhibitors and their effects on AC2M2 mouse breast cancer growth and metastasis in vivo

2013· article· en· W3176366785 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maaike Hum, Ryan A. Dercho, Jason Z. Vlahakis, Walter A. Szarek, Bruce E. Elliott, Kanji Nakatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeme oxygenaseIn vivoHemeAngiogenesisBreast cancerAzoleCancer researchMetastasisCancerBiliverdinGrowth inhibitionCancer cellPharmacologyCell growthMedicineChemistryInternal medicineBiologyEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heme oxygenase (HO) catalyzes the breakdown of heme to biliverdin, free iron, and carbon monoxide. The two major isoforms, HO‐1 (inducible) and HO‐2 (constitutive), are involved in a variety of physiological functions, including apoptosis, inflammation and angiogenesis ‐ important in the growth of some types of cancer. Previous work using metalloporphyrin‐based compounds identified HO inhibition as a potential therapy for some cancers. These compounds are limited by their lack of selectivity for HO and inhibit other heme‐dependent enzymes. Novel azole‐based HO inhibitors have demonstrated increased in vitro selectivity for HO and were tested for their effects on breast cancer growth & progression. In vitro experiments included observing the effects on AC2M2 cell viability and endothelial tube growth in an aortic ring model. In vivo experiments involved the implantation of AC2M2 cells into the mammary fat pad of female nude mice, which then received metronomic treatment with an azole‐based compound or vehicle. Primary tumours were removed on day 21 and metastases grew for another 14 days. Based on previous results, we hypothesized that the azole‐based HO inhibitors would decrease primary tumour volume and decrease the incidences of lung metastases, when compared to control. The findings will help determine whether HO is an appropriate target in the treatment of breast cancer. (Funded by the Ontario Institute of Cancer Research 08NOV‐142; MH is the recipient of a Fellowship from the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation ‐ Ontario Region)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon MonoxideFrench-language works237,207