MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Animate! Breathing new life into an old pedagogy: Human embryology teaching reenvisioned

2019· article· en· W3176381219 on OpenAlexaff
Olusegun Oyedele, Brittany Calibaba

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFeminist Theory and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimationEmbryologyComputer scienceCurriculumMultimediaAnatomyVisual artsPsychologyArtMedicineComputer graphics (images)Pedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The teaching of human embryology is as ancient as that of human anatomy itself. Over the centuries up to the present time, embryology pedagogy has evolved from enlisting the dissection of fetal cadavers and use of two‐dimensional (2D) sketches and diagrams, to the modern technologies of 2D and 3D animations, CT scans of embryos and fetuses with 3D rendering of the images, and the use of ultrasound imaging. These techniques seek to balance accurate portrayal of embryonic structures with the cognitive load associated with learning the concepts presented using these images, and their value as learning adjuncts for students. This paper discusses the rationale, pedagogical basis and implementation of narrated 2D animations of embryonic development, which present the early stages of human life in accessible cartoon‐like sequences. In response to the demand from curriculum leaders at the University of British Columbia (UBC) medical school for high‐quality, simplified yet accurate rendition of early embryonic development, we have developed the first of a series of 2D animations, which presents key embryonic processes during the first 12 weeks of life contemporaneously. First and second year MD students at UBC will have access to these animations as adjuncts to the embryology components of the MD Undergraduate pre‐clerkship program. The animation was developed using Adobe Animate® software during approximately 300 hours of programming. Audio design, recording and editing were completed with Adobe Audition®, After Effects® and Adobe Premiere Pro®. In evaluating the animation, students rated it highly for visual appeal and helpfulness to learn basic embryology, while providing useful comments on how it may be improved. Support or Funding Information Southern Medical Program, UBC Faculty of Medicine This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesFrench-language works237,207