MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176518322 · doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000003235

Comparing Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery to Post-Auricular Microscope-Guided Surgery in Pediatric Ossiculoplasty: Hearing Outcomes and Post-Operative Pain

2021· article· en· W3176518322 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOtology & Neurotology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOtologic Surgical ProceduresHearing lossEndoscopyMastoidectomyMEDLINEMiddle ear

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This study compares post-operative hearing outcomes and morbidity after pediatric total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) ossiculoplasty with transcanal totally endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) versus a post-auricular microscope-guided (PAM) approach. PATIENTS: Forty-four children who underwent ossiculoplasty with titanium TORP after previous cholesteatoma surgery. INTERVENTION: Ossiculoplasty using TEES or PAM approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing outcome after ossiculoplasty was determined by post-operative air-bone gap (ABG) on audiogram nearest to 1 year after surgery. Post-operative morbidity was measured by total number of opiate doses the child received during hospital stay, along with the highest documented post-operative pain score. Comparisons were made with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Hearing data were available for 41 patients: 21 had undergone TEES (median preoperative ABG 39 dB) and 20 had PAM surgery (median preoperative ABG 39 dB). Post-operatively at 1 year, ABG closed significantly in each group (TEES 21 dB, p = 0.003; PAM 23 dB, p = 0.01), and there was no difference between groups (p = 0.6). 57% who underwent TEES and 50% who underwent PAM surgery experienced serviceable hearing post-operatively, defined as air conduction pure-tone average (PTA) ≤ 30 dB HL. Visual analogue pain scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) were available for 13 who underwent TEES and 18 who underwent PAM surgery. In children undergoing TEES, only two reported pain above 0, with the highest pain score being 4. Children undergoing PAM surgery had a median pain score of 3 (median difference = 3, p < 0.001). Children undergoing TEES required fewer weight appropriate doses of opiate analgesic (median = 0) than children who underwent PAM surgery (median = 1) (median difference = 1, p = 0.003). Children undergoing TEES had a significantly shorter surgical time (median 135 min) than those who underwent PAM surgery (median 168 min) (median difference = 33 min, p = <0.006). CONCLUSION: Hearing outcomes in TORP ossiculoplasty are similar in TEES and PAM surgery, and TEES may decrease post-operative pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtology & NeurotologySame topicEar Surgery and Otitis MediaFrench-language works237,207